Category Archives: Blogosphere

Your Virtual Front Page, Wednesday, May 22, 2013

Quite a newsy day:

  1. Obama Set To Restart Guantanamo Transfers (WSJ) — So far, I’m only seeing this from the WSJ…
  2. Man tied to Boston suspect is killed in FBI interview (WashPost) — Another young Chechen. I’m not saying he’s right, but somewhere Vladimir Putin is saying, “I told you so…”
  3. U.S. admits to killing four of its citizens abroad (WashPost) — Note to Rand Paul: These were NOT in the U.S….
  4. Man killed in meat-cleaver terror attack in London (The Guardian) — The U.S. reports said “machete.” Still. Is it just me, or are terrorists getting more and more primitive? A knife? A machete?
  5. SC Senate bill to allow guns in restaurants, bars advances in House with fewer restrictions (thestate.com) — Because the House doesn’t want to be out-crazied by the Senate.
  6. Emails Suggest IRS Criteria Developed by Lower-Level Workers (WSJ) — Which is kinda, you know, what we were told in the first place…

An insider’s perspective on the Sanford campaign, Part I

The author with the candidate.

The author with the candidate.

Several weeks ago, my friend Clare Morris said she planned to go down to Charleston and volunteer in Mark Sanford’s campaign sometime before the 1st Congressional District special election was over. Knowing that she went to college with the guy, and worked for him in his congressional office and later in his Commerce Department, I did not react with shock or horror. At least, not outwardly. I flatter myself that I’m good at the deadpan reaction.

When I ran into her at the benefit for Boston bombing victims Tuesday evening at the Capital City Club, she started telling me about working in the campaign. I asked her to write a guest piece about the experience. She jumped at the opportunity. In fact, she got into it enough that she’s giving it to me in a couple (or maybe even three) installments. This is the first.

So never let it be said that nothing sympathetic to Mark Sanford runs in this bit of the blogosphere. Enjoy Clare’s report:

How I Spent the Final Days of Mark Sanford’s Congressional Campaign

By Clare Morris

I’ve known Mark Sanford since I was 17 years old. We met during Orientation Week for Furman’s Class of ’83.

I’ve always liked Mark – he was an easygoing and fun guy in college.

When he was elected to Congress in the mid-‘90’s, I worked as his press secretary. We kept in touch over the years, and when he became governor of South Carolina, I was the spokesperson for the SC Department of Commerce.

This gives a little context to what I’m about to describe.

I went to Charleston the last few days before the 1st Congressional District special election and volunteered for Mark’s campaign.

When I told people that was what I was planning to do, the answer was pretty much, “Are you crazy???” I was like, “He’s an old friend from college, and I want to be there to support him.”

So, here’s a little timeline of what it was like:

 

Sunday, May 5th

I wind around East Bay Street in Charleston until I finally find the campaign headquarters. It’s in this small kind of dirty old building across from the Harris Teeter.

I get there and Mark is chatting with a couple who have driven all the way up from Fort Lauderdale to help with his campaign – Laura and Paul. When I noticed that Paul had on a jacket that had a Cato Institute logo on it, I thought, well, this guy is a true believer.

It had been years since Mark and I had seen each other – I’d left Commerce in 2006 to start my own company – and he seemed so tickled to see me. He gave me a big hug, thanked me for coming, introduced me to Paul and Laura, and made me promise that we’d have a “visit.”

What was so interesting about seeing him after all these years is that he seemed so comfortable in his own skin and genuinely happy. You’ve heard in press reports that he’s humbled and appreciative of the support he’s received from former staffers and volunteers, and that’s absolutely how his demeanor seemed.

The campaign headquarters was filled with former staffers (folks I’d worked with back in the mid-‘90’s) and volunteers from all over. The atmosphere was unbridled optimism.

The volunteer coordinator needed us to make calls to get people out to vote and to encourage them to support Mark. The phones were pretty complicated, and the Florida couple and I needed a little orientation to figure out how to work them.

They had phone numbers of likely Mark supporters queued up, and also a script to follow. It was something like this:

“Hi! My name is Clare (no last name) and I’m a friend of Mark Sanford.  I’m just calling to remind you that the special congressional election is coming up on Tuesday. Are you planning to vote?”

At this point, you would document their answer directly into the phone. The next part was:

“Great! Do you think Mark can count on your support?”

Again, you document their answer and thank them for their time.

I have very limited campaign experience. What was really notable about this campaign, however, was that volunteers were instructed to absolutely not say anything bad about the opponent. I was told, “We’re really not into that.”

I made 100 calls that afternoon. It was pretty even between Mark and his opponent. However, one kind of crazy old irate guy said, “If I were you, I wouldn’t say that I’m a friend of Mark Sanford’s!”

I said, “Well, actually, I am. We went to college together.”

He hung up on me.

 

Monday, May 6th

I purposely wore a dress and heels that day so that I wouldn’t have to hold up campaign signs out by the street.

I was back on phone duty and this time the folks I called could not tell me soon enough that they were voting for Mark and they were taking several of their friends to the polls. They actually interrupted my spiel to tell me that.

Also, interestingly enough, several folks I spoke to said that they were praying for him. One lady actually said that she and her friends were going to hold a prayer vigil for him that night. I made sure to tell him that and he seemed really touched by that.

Not all of the volunteers were human. There was this one lady who dressed up her dachshund and rolled him around in a stroller that had “Mark Sanford for Congress” stickers all over it. She talked to Mark every time he came in the room. I asked him at a volunteer appreciation cookout that night how he knew her, and he said that he didn’t.

At that party, the lady was taking pictures and suddenly put her little dog on my lap. I was sitting by Mark and he started making fun of me. A little while later, she put the dog on his lap. All of a sudden, it wasn’t that funny after all.

More to come…Election Day, the victory party, and meeting Maria.

With the dog...

With the dog…

Your Virtual Front Page, Tuesday, May 14, 2013

FSB photo showing alleged International Man of Mystery Ryan Christopher Fogle, seated at right.

FSB photo showing alleged International Man of Mystery Ryan Christopher Fogle, seated at right. I like the touch of the one guy with the digitally blurred face.

It depends on what the definition of “news” is. Here’s mine, at this particular moment:

  1. FBI launches criminal probe of IRS conduct (WashPost) — One of two front-page stories out of a Holder presser today. The Post reveals an IG report on the mess as well.
  2. Russia to Expel American, Saying He Is a C.I.A. Officer (NYT) — If the latter-day KGB’s colorful allegations have any truth to them — if he indeed offered a potential agent $1 million a year — I want to go on record now as saying I am available to help CIA in any way I can. If I can lay my hands on the information, it’s yours. Do I get a decoder ring? And do I get to meet Anna Chapman?
  3. Holder: AP story posed major security threat (The Guardian) — Today’s other Holder story. By the way, he had called the presser to talk about Medicare fraud. But neither big headline that emerged was about that. Sort of like with the Obama-Cameron thing yesterday.
  4. Columbia couple sues state over toddler’s sexual reassignment surgery (thestate.com) — From the WTF file. However this lawsuit comes out, I don’t see how anyone is a winner…
  5. Wal-Mart Goes Solo on Bangladesh Initiatives (WSJ) — Following on actions by European retailers yesterday.
  6. Horror at Syria ‘heart-eating video’ (BBC) — I hope you weren’t eating dinner as you read this. I think maybe somebody in Syria has watched “Red Dawn” a few too many times…

Your Virtual Front Page, Monday, May 13, 2013

Here’s what we have at this hour:

  1. Justice Department secretly obtained AP phone records (The Guardian) — AP’s top exec calls it a “massive and unprecedented intrusion.” Technically, the intrusion did not actually have mass and therefore couldn’t be “massive” (I once had an editor for whom this was a pet peeve), but you know what he meant.
  2. Obama says he ‘will not tolerate’ IRS misdeeds (WashPost) — The word “outrageous” was used. What I want to know is, if the IRS had to screw up like this, why did they have to do it to groups that believe, as an article of faith, that this is just the kind of thing government would do?
  3. Obama dismisses criticism of Benghazi talking points as ‘side show’ (WashPost) — Me, I’m feeling bad for PM David Cameron. Two headlines from his joint presser with POTUS, and neither is about their meeting. So much for the Special Relationship. Meanwhile… a car bomb kills several people in… Benghazi.
  4. Philly abortion doctor guilty in 3 babies’ deaths (AP) — There were a lot of stories out there on this, but I used this because it was the only headline that used the word, “babies.”
  5. Major Retailers Join Bangladesh Safety Plan (NYT) — Meanwhile, the death toll from the building collapse tops 1,100.
  6. Steve Benjamin seeks re-election as Columbia mayor (thestate.com) — But I already mentioned that.

Your Virtual Front Page, Wednesday, May 8, 2013

Just some quick headlines:

  1. Official recounts frustration at Libya response (WashPost) — According to Jennifer Rubin, it was more dramatic than that headline makes it sound.
  2. Bangladesh death toll tops 800 (The Guardian) — It just gets worse and worse.
  3. Charges in Cleveland Abduction  (WSJ) — What a horrific story.
  4. Jenny wins; Sanford admits to being in contempt (AP) — Of his divorce decree. His contempt for the people of the 1st District, and their willingness to submit to it, is another matter.
  5. 17 U.S. officers stripped of missile power (The Guardian) — Nuclear missiles, that is. A very disturbing leaked report.
  6. Lawmakers Shift Focus to Sex Assaults in Military (NYT) — This was a bigger story yesterday than today, but I didn’t do a VFP yesterday.

 

Raining in the 1st District

BJrWzIRCQAEyUjY

At 12:52 p.m., the SC Democratic Party Tweeted out the above picture, saying,

It’s raining in #SC01 so we need you to get on the call tool NOW!!!

Yeah, I’m not sure what that means. “Call tool” sounds like what someone whose first language is not English would call a telephone, but the Tweet included a link to this.

In any case, I don’t know that this weather means. Normally, a challenger (which is what Elizabeth Colbert Busch is in this case) needs everything to be perfect to turn out her support in order to turn out the entrenched power (which in this case is Mark Sanford, but it would be true of any Republican in this district).

But… there were all those rumblings — speculation, mostly — about normally reliable GOP voters just staying home this time, on account of Sanford fatigue. (Which is why Sanford has been trying to terrify them with his huge photo of Nancy Pelosi.) The rain would give them an excuse not to bother.

I don’t know. My gut says this hurts the Democrat. But I just don’t know. And neither does anyone else. People say all kinds of thing about the effects of whether on an election, but I don’t find it to be a reliable predictor. It just gives people something to yammer about all day while they wait for results.

Yeah, I sort of already understand THAT language…

language

An odd sort of ad has been cropping up on my Facebook page, over and over. In the screengrab above, you can see two versions of it at once.

I don’t know why I’m getting that. I haven’t searched for language lessons.

But the really puzzling thing is the photographs with the come-ons. I mean, what do large-breasted women (and if there’s something else those photos have in common, please point it out to me) have to do with language lessons?

And I haven’t been searching for pictures like that, either…

… oh, wait. I tell a lie… I did search for “breasts” on the Tapiture and Pinterest sites for this post earlier, to illustrate a point I made about their content policies. Pinterest admonished me for searching for that, by the way, as follows: “Reminder: Pinterest does not allow nudity. Pinning or repinning photographs displaying breasts, buttocks or genitalia may result in the termination of your Pinterest account.”

So that explains the pictures. What it doesn’t explain is what that has to do with learning a language.

Tapiture (a.k.a., ‘Pinterest for Dudes’) breaks no new ground

tapiture

Recently, I happened to mention to a young woman of my acquaintance something that I’d seen on Pinterest, and she stopped me to say, in a mocking sort of way, “You’re on Pinterest?”

We were interrupted at that point, so I didn’t get around to asking her, “Why do you ask it that way?” But I didn’t need to. You see, guys aren’t supposed to be on Pinterest. It’s supposed to be a woman thing. If we had continued on the subject, I would of course have explained, in a deep voice, that I don’t really like Pinterest, that I had only checked it out because I needed to know about it for work (I had been asked to write a post about it for the ADCO blog, which I did, and then wrote a somewhat different one for this blog), and that for me to like it, it would have to have fewer recipes and “cute shoes,” and a lot more stuff about cars and war and Steve McQueen and the “Evil Dead” movies. (Insert Tim Allen’s caveman noises here.)

Last week, a site seeking the success of Pinterest, except among men, came to my attention. It’s called Tapiture. When I searched for information about it, I saw this piece on Slate headlined, “Pinterest for Dudes,” which posed the question, “Is it sexist to create a visual sharing site for men?” (To which my reply is “No. Yes. How could anyone possibly care?”)

I wasn’t all that impressed.

First, it seems to lack the one thing I really liked on Pinterest — which was sort of a limited thing to like, because it was a one-time experience. When I first signed up on Pinterest, as I wrote previously, it kept throwing new images at me based on images I told it I liked. That was interesting, as I played around with it — If I like this, what will it throw at me next? Whether on Netflix or Pandora or Pinterest, I’m intrigued by watching an algorithm try to get to know me. Tapiture gives you a similar opportunity to “like” a wide assortment of images, but if the images coming at you change in keeping with what you’ve liked so far, I couldn’t tell. I think I was just getting a generic feed.

After that, Pinterest and Tapiture are equally disappointing. I would really dig Pinterest if, each time I called it up, it gave me new pins based on the stuff I’d liked so far. It doesn’t. What it gives me is stuff I have pinned (which is limited, since I lost interest in pinning fairly quickly), and recent pins from people I have “followed.” And that gets pretty static. Each time I call it up, I’m looking at pretty much the same stuff. There’s none of the dynamism of new things — more to the point, of ideas — that following people on Twitter gives you. Bottom line, Pinterest gives me no reason to keep going back.

Tapiture does pretty much the same. Not that it’s necessarily boring. I was a bit startled by it at one point. The second time I called it up, having gone through the signup ritual the first time, all of a sudden the pictures of cars and cool architecture and food-that-features-bacon had given way to page after page of pictures that looked like they were from an early-’60s edition of Playboy. Very much softcore, but fairly racy as old-school cheesecake goes. Yikes, I thought, what if my wife uses my laptop and sees this? I didn’t sign up for this.

Actually, I had, without knowing it. In my first foray, I had run across a user who called himself “BillS Preston,” and digging the “Bill & Ted” reference, I “followed” him. All of the skin pictures were coming from him. Which sort of stands to reason, I guess, with a guy who names himself for a quintessential adolescent. (In his defense, he does post other stuff, such as this, but not as often, apparently.) So I unfollowed him, to keep myself out of trouble, and went back to the beer and hunting dogs. And bacon. And the occasional girly picture, but not so it looked like I was obsessed.

Speaking of which… Tapiture says “We do not allow nude photographic images that contain exposed nipples, genitalia, and/or fully exposed buttocks.” Yeah, OK. But you don’t have to be on the site long to see lots of stuff that stretches that envelope. Some users are always going to see just how far they can go, and Tapiture’s users are no exception.

But you know what? That’s not just a Tapiture thing. In fact, I’ve images of female nudity on Pinterest, which doesn’t allow “Sexually explicit content or photographs containing exposed breasts, genitalia and/or buttocks.” Yeah, what do you call this (sure, that’s pretty mild, but it does cross the technical line — and I’m intentionally avoiding anything racier, this being a family blog)?

More to the point, I can also find plenty of cars and dogs and military history — and, yes, bacon — on Pinterest as well. I haven’t seen anything yet on Tapiture that I couldn’t find on the larger site that is theoretically just for chicks.

So guys, if you’re really into staring at lots of pictures of stuff you like (which I find tiring), you really don’t have to remember a new password. It’s all there on Pinterest. Assuming you don’t have anything better to do with your time…

tapiture2

Your Virtual Front Page, Friday, April 26, 2013

A few headlines to close your week with. I mean, a few headlines with which to close your week:

  1. Obama: proof of chemical weapons a ‘game-changer’ (The Guardian) — Can’t for the life of me figure out why American publications are leading with this. I guess it just sounds different from abroad. The American outlets are stressing that the president says the intel isn’t all in yet. But the more important point is that he’s reiterating that if the WMD use is confirmed, it does indeed cross a red line.
  2. Congress sends bill to end airport delays to Obama (WashPost) — Thereby causing Democrats to lose a political lever on any efforts to end the sequester.
  3. 9/11 Plane Debris Found in Lower Manhattan (WSJ) — We’re talking a significant chunk of landing gear.
  4. Survivors found in collapsed factory (BBC) — That is, the factory that collapsed in Bangladesh on Wednesday. Meanwhile, workers rampaged and burned other factories to protest unsafe conditions.
  5. Lexington man accused of branding children (thestate.com) — Not to identify them or anything, just to hurt them.
  6. ‘He stopped loving her today’ (Tennessean) — George Jones, the man Tammy stood by (up to a point), is dead at 81. I can’t resist wondering whether he’ll show up for his own funeral.

Your Virtual Front Page, Thursday, April 25, 2013

A quick look at the headlines:

  1. U.S. Says It Suspects Assad Used Chemical Weapons (NYT) — U.S. joins Israel in saying this.
  2. Boston suspects ‘targeted New York’ (BBC) — It’s interesting that the BBC is leading with this (so is The Guardian), while you can hardly find it on the NYT main page.
  3. S.C. House passes bill to protect children against parental abuse (thestate.com) — Every once in awhile, the Legislature does something that makes sense.
  4. Obama calls Bush ‘a good man’ (WashPost) — He sort of had to, since the occasion was the opening of the Bush library, but I thought it worth noting all the same.
  5. ‘Pimp Stick Quezzy,’ Columbia rapper, pleads guilty to prostitution (thestate.com) — Well, that’s a shock. Some might think he was already sort of pleading guilty when he came up with the monicker.
  6. West Columbia bank robbery suspect arrested waiting on taxi (thestate.com) — See, this is why we need better public transit. How’s a guy supposed to make a getaway if he has to wait for a cab?

Sanford’s continuing with the Nancy Pelosi shtick

Sanford cash

You would think that, after standing on a public street pretending to “debate” a life-sized photograph of Nancy Pelosi, Mark Sanford would realize that he had embarrassed himself in three ways:

  1. By making Rep. Pelosi his target, he’s doing exactly the same thing that he’s accusing Elizabeth Colbert Busch of doing — failing to confront his actual opponent. This “run against the national boogeyman (or woman)” shtick is the last resort of the desperate. It cries out that he has nothing relevant to say to the 1st District. It’s like the political equivalent of how the Tsarnaevs learned to be terrorists — they just got it from the Internet. It’s garden-variety, off-the-shelf, inside-the-Beltway partisan nonsense.
  2. By choosing MUSC as his background, he unnecessarily calls attention to the fact that he has always been hostile to the very idea of public research universities in South Carolina. If Mark Sanford had his way, institutions such as MUSC would not exist. It’s just not a good idea, for him, to remind voters of that.
  3. By standing specifically in front of a building named for Dr. James Colbert — the father of his opponent — he not only demonstrates a shocking cluelessness of landmarks in the main city in his district, but underlines the contributions that his opponent’s family have made to the community in which they are so strongly rooted.

After so thoroughly striking out with this shtick yesterday, you’d think Sanford would abandon it. But above you see a picture of him Tweeted by Stacy Jacobson with the ABC affiliate in Charleston. Her explanation of the picture:

Sanford holds up $1,000. Says Pelosi spent $600k to campaign against him

Sheesh. Never mind that, as an image, it evokes the photo that so embarrassed Mitt Romney.

That’s our former governor. When he finds a way to make himself look silly, he shticks with it…

Your Virtual Front Page, Tuesday, April 23, 2013

Just a quick look at the current headlines:

  1. Syria Used Chemical Arms Repeatedly, Israel Asserts (NYT) — Of the usual sources I peruse, only the NYT and the Guardian are leading with this right now, but I think they’re right.
  2. Officials: U.S. wars motivated Boston suspects (WashPost) — Lots of angles out there on this, but I went with this one.
  3. Haley signs Boeing incentives bill (AP) — The headline pretty much says it.
  4.  (WIS) — Again. This time it’s at Assembly and Laurel streets.
  5. Interview with Elizabeth Colbert Busch (The Guardian) — I found it particularly interesting that a British publication was playing this on high up on their main news web page.
  6. Developer Kahn files for bankruptcy (AP) — I found this shocking, and distressing.

As you can see, I’m unusually heavy on local today. Another interesting story that didn’t quite make the cut, on the Randy Scott saga: Leon Lott says Scott will always have a place in the sheriff’s department.

 

 

Laurin Manning on Mark ‘Poor Me’ Sanford

The Washington Post‘s “Post Partisan” blog brought my attention to something I had missed — that our own Laurin Manning was back in the SC blogosphere. Jonathan Capehart of the Post quoted what Laurin had to say about Mark Sanford’s ridiculously narcissistic full-page advert in the Charleston paper over the weekend. As Laurin wrote:

On Sunday, just days after the horrific Boston Marathon bombings and subsequent events that left three people dead, hundreds wounded, and a nation in shock — and just days after the explosion of a Texas fertilizer plant that killed thirteen people and injured hundreds more — Mark Sanford bought a full-page newspaper ad in the print version of Charleston’sPost & Courier to tell us just what a bad week *he* had.soapbox

In his 1,265-word, quintessentially Sanfordian screed, the former governor and Republican nominee for South Carolina’s First Congressional District begins, “It’s been a rough week….”

Yep, that sounds like Mark Sanford, all right. The poor guy. It’s a wonder he wasn’t invited to speak at one of the funerals of the Boston bombing victims. He could have really cheered up the mourners by saying, “You think this is bad? Let me tell you about my week…”

Anyway, it’s great to see that Laurin — one of my very first blogging friends — is back on the job after a nearly two-year hiatus. Here’s how she announced her return last month:

It’s been a while, y’all. Almost two years! I stopped writing when I moved to Washington, DC to work at a software company called Salsa Labs and then at a Democratic organization called American Bridge through the 2012 election. Back in South Carolina figuring out what’s next — hopefully something around these parts. Don’t know how much writing I’ll have time to do on here, so I’m not making any promises, but we’ll see…

Well, I hope we will see. Here’s hoping she sticks around longer than she did after her last return. Welcome back, Laurin!

Your Virtual Front Page, Thursday, April 11, 2013

aria130411_cmyk.1rz1y9he2aki9wckc4kkcsok4.6uwurhykn3a1q8w88k040cs08.th

Our top stories tonight:

  1. N. Korea may have nuclear missile, U.S. says (WashPost) — So “never mind” on all the dismissive stuff said earlier. The DIA says the missiles will likely be so inaccurate that they’ll have “low reliability.” But hey, aren’t nukes kind of like horseshoes — as in, “close” counts?
  2. G8 states condemn NK nuclear moves (BBC) — Yeah, but I don’t know how much words are going to move the boy dictator.
  3. SC House to fast-track Boeing incentives after Senate OK (thestate.com) — This is after the Senate gave final approval today.
  4. Senate votes yes to gun debate with GOP support (The Guardian) — English news sources are playing this up more than American ones. Our gun fixation fascinates and appalls the Brits.
  5. Notes On A Sex Scandal: Rebounding From Disgrace (NPR) — Guess which South Carolinian gets top billing in this national trend story, which also features the unfortunately named Anthony Weiner planning to run for mayor of NYC?
  6. Creature Combined Human, Ape Traits (WSJ) — For all you missing link fans out there.

Anyone know what’s happening to these pictures?

The way the azaleas really looked.

The way the azaleas really looked.

I raised this question on a previous thread, but I decided to post it separately with actual images of the problem…

I had originally intended to run my little post about the azalea explosion two days ago, when I shot it. But when I went to do so, I saw that my free trial of PhotoShop Elements had run out. (Long story. I got a new laptop several months ago, and it’s wonderful in every way except that I’ve been unable to transfer the very old copy of Photoshop I had on my old laptop to the new one. And the disk is long gone. So until recently, I kept using the old one for blogging, because I had to have something to work pictures with.)

I didn’t want to deal with that right then, so I set the matter aside.

Then yesterday, I went ahead and paid the 100 bucks (technically, $99.99) to buy the PhotoShop Elements (having determined that while it was not full PhotoShop, it did the things I needed — the main thing being, allowing me to quickly reduce the size of picture files).

So, having emailed the azaleas picture to myself from my iPhone, I called it up in my newly purchased application.

And the color was all screwed up. That rich, deep color you see above (quite accurate) was totally washed out to a sort of light lavender or something. I fiddled with the color settings, and lightness and darkness and contrast, and couldn’t make it look anything like reality. Then, I started flipping through other pictures in that folder, and all were sort of weirdly off. Mostly, they were too dark, or had too much contrast. But on some the colors were off, just not this dramatically.

Then I realized that when I called up the azalea file in Windows Live Photo Gallery, the colors were similarly distorted. Which made me think it was something in the display settings of my laptop. And I remembered that I had noticed a similar phenomenon a few days ago when I had transferred photos from my phone, but had been busy and forgot about it.

But… here’s where it gets very weird… when I viewed the emailed azaleas picture within gmail, it looked fine. On the same laptop.

Then… I realized that those distorted-looking pictures I was calling up in the folder where I put photos for the blog on my laptop — pictures I had recently posted — looked fine on the blog itself.

So, I decided to completely ignore the fact that the azaleas picture looked like a color negative or something, and just resize the picture and post it, as an experiment.

And I did. And it looked fine on the blog. It had magically turned back to normal.

So, it looked fine when I sent it to myself, including on the laptop. But if I called it up in the Windows photo viewer, or in PhotoShop, the exposure was distorted to a bizarre degree. But if I didn’t do anything to it and went ahead and put it on the blog, it was back to normal.

Anybody know what in the world is going on? Because I’ve just wasted a lot of money on PhotoShop if I can’t realistically see color and contrast and make adjustments. A hundred bucks is a lot to blow on just being able to take an image down from 36 inches to 16…

The way they looked in PhotoShop Elements.

The way they looked in PhotoShop Elements.

Bang, bang! Your hashtag shot me dead…

At first, I was going to launch into a rant about the stupidity of the people, here in the celebrity-addled West, when I took an additional few seconds to ponder this:

What do you see when you read this Twitter hashtag?

It’s supposed to be about Monday’s death of former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and looks to have been popularized by the website “IsThatcherDeadYet,” which was not upset to hear about the Iron Lady’s passing. “It’s fair to say that we are not fans,” site co-creator Jared Earle told The Guardian.

When Thatcher died, the website asked readers “how are you celebrating?” and suggested they use the #nowthatcherisdead hashtag.

Monday at 7:58 a.m. ET, just after the news broke of Thatcher’s death, the hashtag popped up on Twitter. The first tweet from someone who seemed to have read it wrong came four minutes later:

“So sad to hear that Cher is dead. #nowthatcherisdead.”

That then led to some confusion and amusement. Comedian Ricky Gervais as among those who tried to straighten things out:

“Some people are in a frenzy over the hashtag #nowthatchersdead. It’s ‘Now Thatcher’s dead’. Not, ‘Now that Cher’s dead’ JustSayin’ ”

Idiots! I thought, and then I looked at the hashtag as though I were seeing it without the setup, and realized the natural way to make it out was to read “now,” then “that,” then whatever else one could make of the letters that remained.

So the stupidity, I now think, was on the part of the Thatcher-haters who devised the hashtag. The Cher interpretation makes for a better-written statement. The mind sort of wants a “that” after “now.” I mean, really, the thing would have made more sense, been easier to make out, had it read, “#nowthatthatcherisdead.”

Anyway, so much for the “Cher is dead” rumor. Which turned out not to be nearly as much fun as the “Paul is dead” one. That one had all those clues to look for…

BHZGd58CcAEEM4a

A very bad photo Cher posted on Twitter after rumors spread of her death. Come to think of it, she does have a sort of Elvira, Queen of the Dead thing going there. I don’t know who the kid is.

Your Virtual Front Page, Friday, April 5, 2013

Just a quick run through the news:

  1. Hiring in U.S. Tapers Off as Economy Fails to Gain Speed (NYT) — Not good.
  2. North Korea warns embassies over safety (The Guardian) — OK, so if I say, “Yeah, you’re starting to worry us a little,” do you think the boy dictator would back off?
  3. ‘Suspicious liquid’ shuts down Assembly (thestate.com) — This will bear watching.
  4. Obama Budget Is Dismissed by G.O.P. and Attacked by Left (NYT) — Well, then, he must be doing something right.
  5. Randy Scott’s letter requesting leave (thestate.com) — It’s good that the city is no longer hiding behind that “personnel matter” dodge — at least to this extent.
  6. Portugal High Court Strikes Down Some Austerity Measures (WSJ) — Can’t we finish dealing with Cyprus before Portugal has a crisis?

Your Virtual Front Page, Friday, March 22, 2013

aria130324_cmyk.379otvf2gnelwgcsg8sso8cw0.6uwurhykn3a1q8w88k040cs08.th

Wrapping up your week:

  1. Israel apologises to Turkey over Gaza flotilla deaths (The Guardian) — As a result, diplomatic relations are restored.
  2. Supremes rule for county on ‘penny’ vote (thestate.com) — Bus service improvements set for June.
  3. Cyprus pressed for bank breakthrough (BBC) — EU voices say Cyprus needs to come up with the money somehow.
  4. FAA to close 149 airport towers amid budget cuts (WashPost) — The bite starts from sequestration.
  5. Lebanese Leader Resigns Amid Sectarian Tensions  (WSJ) — Further destabilizing the neighborhood.
  6. Some Toddler Foods Come With A Megadose Of Salt (NPR) — I had no idea…